tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8343118075601166818.comments2009-06-26T19:57:03.783-07:00Allied Atheist Allianceadvertisinglieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08798920816812190571noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8343118075601166818.post-34741352314568902582009-06-26T19:57:03.783-07:002009-06-26T19:57:03.783-07:00I think that's what makes it such an interesti...I think that's what makes it such an interesting question - siding with either argument almost immediately creates possible negative outcomes further down the line. To say that a religious group can't use a public room because they're religious begs the question of discrimination while allowing religious groups to use public buildings for the express purpose of worship leads to possible complications down the road in regard to proselytizing on the public dime in a federally funded space.advertisinglieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08798920816812190571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8343118075601166818.post-76818430968995630402009-06-26T16:27:40.697-07:002009-06-26T16:27:40.697-07:00Although I hesitate to allow any religious-themed ...Although I hesitate to allow any religious-themed event on publicly-funded ground, I do have to ask what will happen if a precedent is set that allows (or requires) the library from prohibiting a group from using the meeting rooms based on that group's content? At what point do the library's get to say "we don't support the theme of your group" and have it not be discrimination?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com